Sun Apr 23, 2017 7:57 pm
ghanshyamsavani's CNP Gallery       |      Send PM to ghanshyamsavani     |       [NEW] Recent Comments by ghanshyamsavani

Ghanshyam Savani

ghanshyamsavani  Joined CNP On 27 Jul 2014    Total Image posts 740    -   Total Image Comments 409    -   Image Post to Comment Ratio 1:1    -   Image Comment Density 50     -     Total Forum Posts 26

Rating & SHARING

not rated
Login to rate this image

Post a comment


Commentby Ganesh H Shankar on Sun Apr 23, 2017 9:58 pm

Excellent, Ghanshyam.

Did Nature implant the definition of art in our mind? Just pondering..

Ganesh H. Shankar
Wishing you best light,

Personal Websites Fine Art Nature Photography | www.ArtOfLife.Gallery
Facebook Pages Ganesh H. Shankar | Fine Art Nature Photography | Art Of Life

Commentby dinesh.ramarao on Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:41 pm

"Did Nature implant the definition of art in our mind ? "
"Is art natural in our mind? "

Ghanshyam, regret for not being able to comment on your wonderful creations, which you churn almost every hour, your series of just the two of us, the season varieties like this one, and many more have been enjoyable creations.
Your simple compositions make a complex and strong statement. Great expressions.
Keep them coming.

Commentby madhavjois on Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:11 pm

Great seeing this Ghanshyam ji! Such an eloquent frame this is, it sings!

Best Regards,
My Gallery

Commentby ghanshyamsavani on Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:31 pm

@GHS...Thanks for nice comment-question: Did Nature implant the definition of art in our mind? Just pondering..

@RD............."Did Nature implant the definition of art in our mind ? "
"Is art natural in our mind?


I find these questions very poignant so far as creation is concerned. If we have to understand Creation not in its limited definition, but in its totality, the following insights by J Krishnamurti would be at an immense help to grasp the wholeness of the question. Somewhere in the following Discourse we will find the answer of these questions.

What Is Creation?

What is the origin of all existence, from the minutest cell to the most complex brain? Was there a beginning at all, and is there an end to all this? What is creation? To probe into something totally unknown, not preconceived, and not be caught in any sentimental, romantic illusion, there must be a quality of brain that is completely free from all its conditioning, from all its programming, from every kind of influence, and therefore highly sensitive and tremendously active. Is that possible? Is it possible to have a mind, a brain, that is extraordinarily alive, not caught in any form of routine, not mechanical? Do we have a brain in which there is no fear, no self-interest, no self-centered activity? Otherwise it is living in its own shadow all the time, it is living in its own tribal, limited environment, like an animal tied to a stake.

A brain must have space. Space is not only a distance between here and there, space implies being without a center. If you have a center and you move away from the center to the periphery, however far the periphery is, it is still limited. So, space indicates no center and no periphery, no boundary. Have we a brain that doesn’t belong to anything, is not attached to anything—to experience, conclusions, hopes, ideals—so that it is really, completely free? If you are burdened, you can’t walk very far. If the brain is crude, vulgar, self-centered, it cannot have measureless space. And space indicates—one is using the word very, very carefully—emptiness.

We are trying to find out if it is possible to live in this world without any fear, without any conflict, with a tremendous sense of compassion, which demands a great deal of intelligence. You cannot have compassion without intelligence. And that intelligence is not the activity of thought. One cannot be compassionate if one is attached to a particular ideology, to a particular narrow tribalism, or to any religious concept, for those limit. And compassion can only come—be there— when there is the ending of sorrow, which is the ending of self-centered movement.

So space indicates emptiness, nothingness. And because there is not a thing put there by thought, that space has tremendous energy. So the brain must have the quality of complete freedom and space. That is, one must be nothing. We are all something: analysts, psychotherapists, doctors. That is all right, but when we are therapists, biologists, technicians, those very identifications limit the wholeness of the brain.

Only when there is freedom and space can we ask what meditation is. Only when one has laid the foundation of order in life can one ask what true meditation is. There cannot be order if there is fear. There cannot be order if there is any kind of conflict. Our inward house must be in complete order, so there is great stability, with no waffling around. There is great strength in that stability. If the house is not in order, your meditation has very little meaning. You can invent any kind of illusion, any kind of enlightenment, any kind of daily discipline, it will still be limited, illusory, because it is born out of disorder. This is all logical, sane, rational; it is not something the speaker has invented for you to accept. May I use the words undisciplined order? Unless there is order that is not disciplined order, meditation becomes very shallow and meaningless.

What is order? Thought cannot create psychological order because thought itself is disorder, because thought is based on knowledge, which is based on experience. All knowledge is limited, and so thought is also limited, and when thought tries to create order it brings about disorder. Thought has created disorder through the conflict between “what is” and “what should be,” the actual and the theoretical. But there is only the actual and not the theoretical. Thought looks at the actual from a limited point of view, and therefore its action must inevitably create disorder. Do we see this as a truth, as a law, or just as an idea? Suppose I am greedy, envious; that is what is; the opposite is not. But the opposite has been created by human beings, by thought, as a means of understanding “what is” and also as a means of escaping from “what is.” But there is only “what is,” and when you perceive “what is” without its opposite, then that very perception brings order.

Our house must be in order, and this order cannot be brought about by thought. Thought creates its own discipline: do this, don’t do that; follow this, don’t follow that; be traditional, don’t be traditional. Thought is the guide through which one hopes to bring about order, but thought itself is limited, therefore it is bound to create disorder. If I keep on repeating that I am British, or that I am French, or that I am a Hindu, or a Buddhist, that tribalism is very limited, that tribalism causes great havoc in the world. We don’t go to the root of it to end tribalism; we try to create better wars. Order can come into being only when thought, which is necessary in certain areas, has no place in the psychological world. The world itself is in order when thought is absent.

It is necessary to have a brain that is absolutely quiet. The brain has its own rhythm, is endlessly active, chattering from one subject to another, from one thought to another, from one association to another, from one state to another. It is constantly occupied. One is not aware of it generally, but when one is aware without any choice, choicelessly aware of this movement, then that very awareness, that very attention, ends the chattering. Please do it, and you will see how simple it all is.

The brain must be free, have space and psychological silence. You and I are talking to each other. Thought is being employed because we are speaking a language. But to speak out of silence... There must be freedom from the word. Then the brain is utterly quiet, though it has its own rhythm.

Then what is creation, what is the beginning of all this? We are inquiring into the origin of all life, not only our life, but the life of every living thing: the whales in the depths, the dolphins, the little fish, the minute cells, vast nature, the beauty of a tiger. From the most minute cell to the most complex human—with all his inventions, with all his illusions, with his superstitions, with his quarrels, with his wars, with his arrogance, vulgarity, with his tremendous aspirations and his great depressions—what is the origin of all this?

Now, meditation is to come upon this. It is not that you come upon it. In that silence, in that quietness, in that absolute tranquillity, is there a beginning? And if there is a beginning, there must be an ending. That which has a cause must end. Wherever there is a cause, there must be an end. That is a law, that is natural. So is there a causation at all for the creation of man, the creation of all the way of life? Is there a beginning of all this? How are we going to find out?


Ghanshyam Savani

» Last edited by ghanshyamsavani on Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:48 pm; edited 2 times in total

Commentby ghanshyamsavani on Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:52 pm


What is creation? Not of the painter, nor the poet, nor the man who makes something out of marble; those are all things manifested. Is there something that is not manifested? Is there something that, because it is not manifested, has no beginning and no end? That which is manifested has a beginning, has an end. We are manifestations. Not of divine something or other, we are the result of thousands of years of so-called evolution, growth, development, and we also come to an end. That which is manifested can always be destroyed, but that which is not, has no time.

We are asking if there is something beyond all time. It has been the inquiry of philosophers, scientists, and religious people to find that which is beyond the measure of man, which is beyond time. Because if one can discover that, or see that, that is immortality. That is beyond death. Man has sought this, in various ways, in different parts of the world, through different beliefs, because when one discovers, realizes that, then life has no beginning and no end. It is beyond all concepts, beyond all hope. It is something immense.

Now, to come back to earth. You see, we never look at life, our own life, as a tremendous movement with a great depth, a vastness. We have reduced our life to such a shoddy little affair. And life is really the most sacred thing in existence. To kill somebody is the most irreligious horror, or to get angry, to be violent with somebody.

We never see the world as a whole because we are so fragmented, so terribly limited, so petty. We never have the feeling of wholeness, where the things of the sea, the things of the earth, nature, the sky, the universe, are part of us. Not imagined—you can go off into some kind of fancy and imagine that you are the universe, and then you become cuckoo. But break down this small, self-centered interest, have nothing of that, and from there you can move infinitely.

And meditation is this, not sitting cross-legged, or standing on your head, or doing whatever one does, but having the feeling of the complete wholeness and unity of life. And that can come only when there is love and compassion.

One of our difficulties is that we have associated love with pleasure, with sex, and for most of us love also means jealousy, anxiety, possessiveness, attachment. That is what we call love. Is love attachment? Is love pleasure? Is love desire? Is love the opposite of hate? If it is the opposite of hate, then it is not love. All opposites contain their own opposites. When I try to become courageous, that courage is born out of fear. Love cannot have an opposite. Love cannot be where there is jealousy, ambition, aggressiveness.

And where there is the quality of love, from that arises compassion. Where there is that compassion, there is intelligence—but it is not the intelligence of self-interest, or the intelligence of thought, or the intelligence of a great deal of knowledge. Compassion has nothing to do with knowledge.

Only with compassion is there that intelligence that gives humanity security, stability, a vast sense of strength.

J Krishnamurti: This Light in Oneself

Ghanshyam Savani

Commentby dinesh.ramarao on Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:35 am


All your readings influence your creations. However, we (I'm including Ganesh and others if any) did not ask you to answer, but , they were the questions that came to our mind when we see your images.
If some narration needs to be added, if you feel to add, then they need to be your thoughts rather than your readings directly. This is because, I too read a bit, try to understand them, some I do, some I don't, but in the end I would have my own interpretations of them based on my experiences. So, instead of trying to find "answers" or "narrations" from great books / writers / thinkers directly I have always preferred to find them as supplementary to all those readings.
So, according to me it would have been apt, if you had added your own narration rather than so to say "cut and paste" from books / articles. However, you could just share the link for further reading by viewers if they wish to.

Books / music / movies / people / nature have great influence on us. Your images / art is the best example of that. Your art is an interpretation (can i say that ? i don't know) of your experiences around you.

The best is when images don't need any text associated with that and is left for the viewer to consume it as he / she wants. However, I am sure we are miles away.


Commentby ghanshyamsavani on Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:10 pm


Thank you very much, Sir for your views on the way of my citing long and exhausting excerpts from different books and I beg your pardon, too, doing so. Sir, I never take the matter as Questions-Answers, but rather as a process of reciprocal sharing out of sheer joy. I respect and value your words. My sharing from books is not my big-stick or my power-performance in any way. But let me admit herein that never before in my life have I come across such SEERS and multidimensional enlightened visionaries like Osho and J Krishnamurti who have given so profound and transparent insights on almost all the dimensions of life in general and on Art in particular that we can never imbibe such profundity and vastness of it. These enlightened beings who have contributed their intuitions, insights and visions on Art and that are every so often beyond our perceptions and consciousness.

We all differ in our manifestation and subjectivity and we do differ in our modes of sharing because I do believe this enables us to break our built-in monotony which is very poignant because such citing of great beings gives us new space and sparkling glimpses without any centre, otherwise our societal mind-sets are a big crowd conditioned very deeply in every possible way. We are very limited. Our consciousness is very shallow. We are unable to grasp the wholeness of life. We are extremists- our strings are either very loose or very tight and that’s why we are unable to create harmonious music on our instruments. It creates chaos and noise. Our views, our thoughts and our knowledge are always borrowed though we are of the opinion that these are our own.

By philosophical discussion we never arrive to any conclusion if we want really to touch, smell, taste, see and hear the very core of Art. It is beyond all logic. Art is very arduous and yet very aromatic. It is very airy. A form of Art is a ripple in the pond of creativity. We can be total in Art, but not perfect in Art. Perfection is a concept conceived by the mind and it is within the periphery of the mind. Totality is the sky of Art. Perfection kills the heart of Art. Totality gives tonality to Art. To me, Art is my meditation, expression of my inner being, my conversation, my poetry, my music, my dance and my whole celebration. I live it, I sing it, I dance it and I celebrate it. To me Art is fragrance of this celestial existence- I see it, I feel it, I taste it, I smell it, I listen to it and I touch it…..! Art is my confluence with the Existence.

I never go short-cuts; I always go a long way. I understand we are always in a state of acceleration and hurriedness. We don’t have enough time to meditate over this. Our interpretations are as conditioned and hollow as our limited mind-sets.

On facts, figures and technicality, we can offer something from our own memory and experiences, but when some esoteric matter is there then we prove ourselves very limited human beings. At this point of the matter we can take a quantum-leap to go beyond our minds if we are at a help of words shared by eminent seers like Osho J Krishnamurti and George I Gurdjieff. They give us new and fresh eyes to see that which is unknowable. We have very mediocre eyes, very physical and gross. We need inner eyes that can see beyond our mind. Art is a field to go beyond our mind and to attain no-mind where we have infinite space without any periphery, without any centre.

I monotonously never do simple “cut and paste” when I have to say something which is beyond our limited and conditioned minds. I relate it with my past reading and I again go through it with my fullest consciousness and responsibility and then I post the INSIGHTS by these great seers.

I love to be with a person like you who has his own way of seeing life…..and I am blessed to be a part of CNP and to receive your words, comments and your appreciation on my images. Sir, thanks a lot for it and I do mean it with all my heart.

I wish CNP to be enriched with all possible flowering where art of SEEING is the way of life….!

Thanks and warm regards....

Ghanshyam Savani

» Last edited by ghanshyamsavani on Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:16 pm; edited 1 time in total

Commentby Adithya Biloor on Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:02 pm

I am always wondered about simplicity and profoundness of your many images. This is one such image.

And, yes, at times I too fail to relate with the extracts of books you accompany with the images. I would like to hear directly from you, if it is possible, because it gives more insights about the image.

But, yes, we are all different and have different way of seeing both life and art.
As long as you provide an opportunity to see wonderful images like this I am fine with other things :)

Adithya Biloor

Commentby ghanshyamsavani on Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:35 pm

@Adithya Biloor........

Yes, Sir........T H A N K S & R E G A R D S......

Ghanshyam Savani

Commentby dinesh.ramarao on Tue May 02, 2017 9:48 am

I consumed "Perfection kills the heart of Art"