Nagraj, I like your observation
the 'V' shape has given movement in the image I must admit however that it is not by design and it did not occur to me. Now I see what you mean. Also, I have not understood part of the comment
rest of the portion (visible) is not going well with the image - which visible portion you are talking about ? Rocks ? Sorry it is not clear to me.
Nevil, I am more comfortable if you address me as Ganesh - "ji"/"sir" is not necessary
Honestly it makes me uncomfortable
For those who don't know, in Indian culture (more so in northern part of India) people add "ji" at the end of the name to show respect.
VMR, agree with you about potential of 600mm F4 in grassland. Off late my comfort level of using it has gone down ! It is very easy to slip into comfort zone with these long teles.
Brad, I agree with your observation that we will never be able to faithfully reproduce relative differences
in tonal values. Criticism ? not at all. Thanks for your suggestions. I would love to have as many constructive criticism/views like you did here as possible. Purpose of this forum to learn from others views. In my own views/critics in this forum I try to identify strengths as I see and improvement opportunities again as I see them. Though
Wow, I like it kind of short views may give some momentory gratification it does nothing for us to grow as photographers - just my humble views. I have always liked your expressive at the same time very constructive views on NPN (and now here). Congrats on your new aquisition! You are right it can be used to make some great animal scapes.
Thank you all friends for your views..