We live in a world where seemingly infinite choices of resources in any form of art pursuit seems to be the norm. Take photography for example. In terms of gear, we have latest and greatest cameras released every couple of years. And a plethora of lenses from Wide angle to Super Telephoto is available to suit one's budget. And no subject is far away, as many modes of travel and stay options make it easy for one to reach them. In summary, we are swamped with choices in our resource arsenal. How is that abundance of resources affecting our creativity? Is abundance spurring or retarding our creativity? Are we spoilt for choices? Are we lost because we have lots of choices? What if we reverse the trend and bring back the constraints of the old world? Can constraints be generative?
I guess there are no obvious answers here. It can be very subjective. Some of us might get distracted and lose focus by the abundance of resources. Some of us can get motivated and feel liberated by the abundance of resources. My experience has been that imposing constraints on my photographic endeavor has been refreshing, challenging and rewarding.
I just went to shoot an inconspicuous road side tree this morning (23 Jan 2022). The subject is an Indian Almond tree. This tree is unique in that it sheds its leaves in late Jan/early Feb. Whenever I shoot this tree (this is the second year), I am challenged with these constraints:
1. Shoot only this tree. Nothing else.
2. Only one point of view. Just look up.
3. Mostly one lighting. Back lit.
4. Mostly one kind of rendering. Silhouette.
5. Lots of obstacles. Hanging wires, electric poles are abound. Cluttered branches.
Before it hurriedly blooms, I visit this tree few times. I shoot with different gear. At the end of this sojourn, all that rusted gear and my corroded seeing get polished.
I thought I will share it here to see whether you have such experiences. Whether you find that constraints can be generative.
What if we keep imposing constraints on ourselves and force ourselves to work within those constraints? Constraints should be such that our reward comes only if we cross the boundaries of routine and enter the realm of creativity within and in spite of those constraints. That transition must take significant effort.
Some examples of constraints: Shoot in only one kind of lighting, say back lit or worse, front lit. Shoot with only one point of view, say looking straight down or looking straight up. Shoot only one subject along with the first two constraints. Go back and shoot the same subject every day for a week. Shoot with only one set of gear: one camera and one focal length. Capture the finished image; no processing outside the camera; what comes out of the camera is final except for resizing. Shoot within a defined space: indoors or outdoors; no moving/looking out of this space. And so on.
When we look around CNP, we see many photographers driven by constraints. Be it Nirlep's human-nature interactions, RD's silhouettes of trees in Art of Clutter, or Ghanshyam's exploration of a tree trunk in Living Khajuraho. Interesting point is that they may not look at it as constraints but a way for their expression. It would be great to hear their thoughts on this too.
You can impose a set of constraints (a combination of them works best) on yourselves and test yourself on how you cope with or work through those constraints. Any such effort should not be one off. It is best practiced over several sessions. You might surprise yourselves with some creative work. That is a reward. Or at the least you might learn about yourselves. That is a better reward. Who knows? Constraints could be generative!
Regards,
Ramesh
