A thought crossed my mind while reading a book recently. It is very much necessary to climb up and down each word that you read in a book with mild, sensitive ploughing on the surface of the words. If we read fast and plough hard, then instead of climbing up and down each word, we will be running through the words, distorting the words, disfiguring them and destroying them completely on some occasions. Not the words on the book, but the words that enter the receptive mind. The meaning of the literature will get distorted or disfigured and loosely connected or disconnected fragments, resulting in a partial or complete loss of the original meaning as intended by its creator. The literature pushed back to a deconstructed stage of understanding. Now, these fragments may result in similar fragments of thoughts which will end up in some corner never accessed by your receptive mind. Is it possible that these fragments attach themselves to Your Original, Creative Thoughts, distort them, and end up as ideas, creative expressions, forms, words, which end up as "really" are not so original? Would you really know, if it is so? Is it possible to identify these fragments and weed them out of the Original Thoughts?......
Now, if a picture is worth a thousand words, then, this effect (of loss of originality), is so quickly compounded while creating images/ Visuals, what we feel may be Original for us.
(It is not about getting inspired by another person work after fully understanding it as the Creator intended)
On the other hand, "Is it possible for one such thought based on a wrong interpretation, may have the potential to become some thing absolutely Original?" (' Wrong ' i mean, not as intended by the Creator)
Just a thought that has been lingering in my head for some time.
Please do share you thoughts.
Thank you
